节点文献

离婚损害赔偿案件中偷拍证据的必要性与合法性——婚姻法第四十六条第(二)项的思考

The Necessity and Legality of the Evidences Secretly Photographed in Harm Compensation Lawsuit on Divorcement

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李小军叶文庆

【Author】 LI Xiaojun, YE Wenqing(Economy and Laws Department of Fuqing Branch of Fujian Normal University,Fuqing Fujian 350300)

【机构】 福建师范大学福清分校经济法律系

【摘要】 婚姻法第四十六条第(二)项规定了"有配偶者与他人同居"而导致离婚的,无过错方有权请求损害赔偿。然而,举证难的问题却使这条规定没有发挥其应有的作用。为此,应当认识到偷拍在此类案件中的必要性;同时,只要偷拍没有损害有过错方和与之同居者之外的人的合法利益,也没有采取违反法律禁止性规定的方法,那么它是具有一定的合法性的。

【Abstract】 The party who has no offence has the right to ask for harm compensation when the divorcement is caused by the fact that the other party has a spouse cohabits with another person of the opposite sex according to Article 46 in marriage law.However,the difficulty of quoting makes this stipulation impossible to take full effect.So,the necessity of evidences secretly photographed should be recognized,and at the same time,the evidences secretly photographed should be legitimate unless they damage other’s legitimate benefits and rights except the party who has offence and the third party,or they are gained in the ways which are prohibited by the law.

  • 【文献出处】 福建师大福清分校学报 ,Journal of Fuqing Branch of Fujian Normal University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年01期
  • 【分类号】D923.9
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】634
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络