【摘要】 传统合同法理论在合同基本范畴方面存在一些重要缺陷,进而导致悖论与一系列理论上的混淆。根据言语行为理论以及行为的法律判断模式,通过语言分析与文本分析,揭示了传统合同成立与生效理论缺陷的根源:由于对"合同"、"成立"、"有效"与"生效"等缺乏清晰的认识,不仅导致相互关系的混淆,也导致在法律要件认识上的错误;澄清了"合同"及其"成立"、"无效"、"有效"、"生效"的含义以及它们之间的内在关联,并在此基础上重构合同效力形态的内在逻辑关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 It was found that there are theoretically material defects in the basic conceptual category of the conventional law of contract,thus resulting in a paradox with a series of confusion.According to the theory of linguistic act and the mode of legal judgment of an act,the root of the defects in the "entering into the contract" and "putting the contract into effect",which are conventionally used in various contracts,is revealed theoretically via linguistic and textual analyses.Because of lack of definitive cognition on the words or phrases such as "contract","entering into the contract","in effect" and "take effect", the mutual confusion between them and wrong cognition of juridical essentials both emerge.For these reasons,it is necessary to ascertain definitely the implications of those words and phrases and their interrelationships,thus restructuring the inherent logical relationship in the expressing form of the effect of contract.更多还原