【摘要】 动物权利观要求我们放弃很多习以为常的利用动物的方式,因而被主流学界看作是激进的观点,并受到各方抨击。本文在蔡守秋教授对动物权利论批评的基础上再次对汤姆.雷根与卡尔.科亨的《动物权利论争》进行评述,对反对动物权利论的观点提出质疑,并在此基础上重新审视了动物权利论。并为所谓的"激进"的令许多人无法接受的动物权利论进行辩护论证。更多还原

【Abstract】 The concept of animal rights which requires human beings to abandon many common ways of using animals is under attack because it is viewed as radical by the mainstream academic field.On the basis of the criticism of the concept made by Professor CAi Shouqiu,the paper comments upon The Animal Rights Debate by Tom Regan and Carl Cohen again,questions the opinion which is against the animal rights and argues for the so-called "radical" and unacceptable concept of animal rights.更多还原