【摘要】 目的:本文探讨Flanker与Simon冲突间的交互作用,以及提示线索位置对其的影响。方法:实验通过将Flanker与Simon两种冲突融合于同一范式,采用斜线任务提高冲突难度,设计上下、左右和斜线三种位置提示线索,并根据其类型的不同将被试分为三组。统计分析冲突下的正确率与反应时数据,用重复测量方差分析得出两种冲突的交互作用,以及不同位置线索对其的影响。结果:总的来说,Flanker冲突和Simon冲突在反应时和正确率上都有显著效应。从正确率来看,上下位置线索时,Flanker和Simon冲突之间的交互作用显著;左右位置线索时交互作用不显著;而斜线位置线索时交互作用边缘显著。从反应时来看,对于三种位置线索,两种冲突间的交互作用都不显著。结论:融合在同一任务中的Flanker冲突与Simon冲突之间是否存在交互作用与提示线索的位置有关。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To investigate the interaction between Flanker conflict and Simon conflict and the effect of different clue locations on it. Methods: By combining Flanker conflict and Simon conflict, the experimental tasks, using the slash task to raise the difficulty, were designed with three different kinds of clue locations (up-down location clues, left-right location clues and slash location clues). The subjects were randomly divided into three groups based on the different clue types. The accuracy and response time were analyzed, and the interaction of the two conflicts, as well as the effect of the clue locations on it, was elicited by variance analysis of repeated measurement. Results: For both Flanker conflict and Simon conflict, there were significances in either accuracy or response time. Considering the accuracy, the interaction between Flanker conflict and Simon conflict was significant in the up-down location clues group, while that in the left-right location clues group was not significant, and there was marginal significant interaction between them in the slash location clues group. For the response time, there was no significant interaction in the three groups. Conclusion: It was suggested that the clue locations had significant effect on the interaction between Flanker conflict and Simon conflict which merged in one task.更多还原