【摘要】 后现代法学在理论诉求与认知价值上迥异于现代法学,它对现代法学赖以存在的基本原则和价值观实施了怀疑、解构,由此,现代法学追求的重要价值——司法正义观发生了巨大变化。后现代法学以一种更加开放和自由的方式来界定正义,强调微观的、实践的、非本质主义的、多元性的正义。后现代主义提供的这一新视角,促使我们反思以往的正义观,启发我们给正义标准以现实的人文关怀,这对于我国司法正义的正确定位和有效生长是不无裨益的。更多还原

【Abstract】 The postmodern jurisprudence is much different from modern jurisprudence in theoretical appealing and cognitive values. The basic principle and values of modern jurisprudence have been suspected and deconstructed. In this background, the judicial justice view as the important value that modern jurisprudence pursues has greatly changed. The postmodern jurisprudence defined justice by a more open and more free way, which emphasized that justice should be microscopic, practical, non-essential and polytrophic. The postmodernism gives us a new angle of view that makes us reconsider the previous justice view,and inspires us to give justice standard the realistic humanistic care. If that,it will be much helpful to correct orientation and effective growth of judicial justice in our country.更多还原