【摘要】 目的探讨知情权和选择权在精神分裂症急性期住院过程中的应用方法。比较知情状况对就诊、住院合作程度的影响。方法先让患者法定监护人享受知情权和选择权,法定监护人同意让患者享受知情权和(或)选择权为知情组,否之为非知情组;患者同意住院为同意组,否之为非同意组。结果非知情组对就诊、住院和治疗的合作率及法定监护人对住院方式的满意率明显高于知情组,经χ2检验,有显著性差异(P<0.05);非知情组就诊、住院和治疗的被强制率显著低于知情组。经χ2检验,有极显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论把急性期精神分裂症患者的知情权和选择权转移给患者法定监护人的方法是切实可行。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To study the way that informed right and election right applied to the hospitalization of acute patients with schizophrenia.Methods The legal guardians of the patients enjoyed informed consent and election right.The patients who were agreed enjoying informed consent and election right enrolled informed consent group,not so the patients were non-informend consent group.The patients agreeing hospitaization enrolled agreeing group,not so the patients were non-agreeing group.The cooperation of hospitalization and treatment was compared.Results There were 248 patients informed hospitalization,382 patients non-informend hospitalization.There were 146 patients agreed hopitalzation,484 patients non-agreed.The cooperate rate and satisfaction rate of non-informed group were significantly higher than those of the informed group.The force rate of non-informed group was significantly lower than that of the informed group.Conclusion It is the better way that the informed and election right of patients distract to the guardian.更多还原