节点文献

两种口腔矫治器治疗OSAHS的临床效果比较

Clinical investigation of two types dental appliances in treatment of OSAHS

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 赵燕玲李松青张佐

【Author】 ZHAO YAN-ling,et al.(Ningxia Med.Coll.,Yinchuan 750004,China)

【机构】 宁夏医学院宁夏银川市第一人民医院

【摘要】 目的比较自行调节式矫治器与ActivatorⅠ型矫治器治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAHS)的临床效果。方法40例OSAHS患者随机分成两组,分别戴用自行设计的自行调节式口腔矫治器和ActivatorⅠ型矫治器,观测主观症状、颞颌关节区舒适度、多导睡眠监测,比较其疗效。结果两组矫治器治疗前后相比较,在主观症状、颞颌关节区舒适度、多导睡眠监测自行调节式口腔矫治器均优于ActivatorⅠ型矫治器。结论自行调节式口腔矫治器的临床效果优于ActivatorⅠ型矫治器。

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the clinical effects of elastic dental appliances and ActivatorⅠappliances used for treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome(OSAHS).Methods Fourty patients of OSAHS were randomly assigned into two groups with 20cases each and wore elastic dental appliances and ActivatorⅠappliances,respectively.Their subjective symptoms,comfortable degree of temporomandbular joint region,PSG were observed to compare the effect of appliances.Results The effect of elastic dental appliances’ group was better than Activator Ⅰ appliances’ group in subjective symptoms,comfortable degree of temporomandbular joint region,PSG between before and after treatment.Conclusion The effect of elastic dental appliances is better than Activator Ⅰ appliances.

【基金】 宁夏自治区自然科学基金项目(NZ-0679);宁夏科技成果转化专项资金(编号2006-12)
  • 【文献出处】 宁夏医学杂志 ,Ningxia Medical Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,2008年10期
  • 【分类号】R766
  • 【被引频次】8
  • 【下载频次】87
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络