【摘要】 目的:比较微创法和传统手术方法治疗腋臭的临床疗效及术后并发症。方法:应用小切口微创法治疗腋臭212例,应用传统的梭形切除术+切口Z成形术治疗腋臭60例,术后将这两种方法的临床疗效和并发症进行比较。结果:应用小切口微创法治疗的病例中,其中出现切口部分裂开1例,皮下血肿13例,皮瓣部分坏死3例,术后23例残留轻度异味;应用传统的梭形切除术+切口Z成形术治疗的病例中,其中出现切口部分裂开者5例,术后均无异味残留。结论:小切口微创法治疗腋臭,术后瘢痕不明显,但臭味去除可能不完全;传统的梭形切除术+切口Z成形术治疗腋臭,臭味去除彻底,但术后瘢痕较长、明显。此两种方法治疗腋臭各有利弊,可根据患者的具体情况和要求选择手术方法。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and complication between the treatment of bromihidrosis with two different methods. Methods 212 patients were applied to the small incision surgical therapy.60 patients were applied to the conventional surgical therapy and Z-plasty. The clinical outcomes and complication of both groups were compared six months after the treatment. Results There were 1 case with incision split, 13 cases with hematoma,3 cases with partial flap necrosis ,23 cases with slightly odor in the the small incision surgical therapy. There were 5 cases with incision split and no odor was remained in any case with the conventional surgical therapy and Z-plasty. Conclusion Each method has its advantage and disadvantage.We can choose the method according to different case.更多还原