节点文献

三氧消毒机与甲醛熏蒸用于血库冰箱消毒效果比较

Efficiency of sterilization for blood bank refrigerator with the method of formaldehyde fumigating and tri-oxygen sterilizer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 彭及良陈菊芬林春婵张小青许瑞环

【Author】 PENG Ji-liang1,CHEN Ju-fen1,LIN Chun-chan2,ZHANG Xiao-qing2,XU Rui-huan2.1.Blood Station of Longgang District,Shenzhen 518116,China;2.Central Hospital of Longgang District,Shenzhen 518116,China

【机构】 广东省深圳市龙岗区血站广东省深圳市龙岗区中心医院

【摘要】 目的比较甲醛熏蒸、三氧消毒机两种消毒方法对血库冰箱空气的消毒效果。方法甲醛熏蒸法是按40mL/m3用量,紧闭冰箱门,熏蒸2h;三氧消毒机消毒法是紧闭冰箱门开机2h,停机40min后使用。消毒前、后进行2次空气采样,培养48h,进行细菌菌落计数。结果两种消毒方法消毒前、后普通细菌数量及真菌生长情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两种方法消毒后,细菌总数均在200cfu/m3以下,但甲醛熏蒸存在毒性残留问题,而三氧消毒机消毒法对人体损害较小。结论三氧消毒机消毒法消毒效果较好,且安装方便,在消毒过程中可开冰箱取血、发血。

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the efficiency of sterilization for blood bank refrigerator with the method of formaldehyde fumigating and tri-oxygen sterilizer.Methods The formaldehyde fumigating method was to fumigate the closed refrigerator with the 40 mL/m3 flow for 2 h.The method of tri-oxygen sterilizer was to run for 2 h with door closed and to use it 40 min later since shutting off.And then air sample before and after sterilization was cultured for 48 h and the bacterial colony was counted.Results There were significant differences before and after sterilization in the bacterial number and the growing status of mycetes(P<0.01).The total counts of bacteria were both below 200 cfu/m3 with the two methods,but there was some residual of toxicity with the formaldehyde fumigating method and little with tri-oxygen sterilizer.Conclusion It is better to use tri-oxygen sterilizer method has better sterilization efficiency,which is convenient to install and take in or put out blood during sterilization.

【关键词】 低温保存血库消毒甲醛
【Key words】 cryoperservationblood bankssterilizationformaldehyde
【基金】 深圳市龙岗区科技计划资助项目([2006]14号-39)
  • 【文献出处】 检验医学与临床 ,Laboratory Medicine and Clinic , 编辑部邮箱 ,2008年14期
  • 【分类号】R187
  • 【下载频次】65
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络