节点文献

TIME-IGGCAS model validation:Comparisons with empirical models and observations

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【Author】 YUE XinAn1,2,3, WAN WeiXing1, LIU LiBo1, NING BaiQi1, ZHAO BiQiang1 & ZHANG ManLian1 1 Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; 2 Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 3 Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

【摘要】 The TIME-IGGCAS (Theoretical Ionospheric Model of the Earth in Institute of Ge- ology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) has been developed re- cently on the basis of previous works. To test its validity, we have made compari- sons of model results with other typical empirical ionospheric models (IRI, NeQuick-ITUR, and TItheridge temperature models) and multi-observations (GPS, Ionosondes, Topex, DMSP, FORMOSAT, and CHAMP) in this paper. Several conclu- sions are obtained from our comparisons. The modeled electron density and elec- tron and ion temperatures are quantitatively in good agreement with those of em- pirical models and observations. TIME-IGGCAS can model the electron density variations versus several factors such as local time, latitude, and season very well and can reproduce most anomalistic features of ionosphere including equatorial anomaly, winter anomaly, and semiannual anomaly. These results imply a good base for the development of ionospheric data assimilation model in the future. TIME-IGGCAS underestimates electron temperature and overestimates ion tem- perature in comparison with either empirical models or observations. The model results have relatively large deviations near sunrise time and sunset time and at the low altitudes. These results give us a reference to improve the model and enhance its performance in the future.

【Abstract】 The TIME-IGGCAS (Theoretical Ionospheric Model of the Earth in Institute of Ge- ology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) has been developed re- cently on the basis of previous works. To test its validity, we have made compari- sons of model results with other typical empirical ionospheric models (IRI, NeQuick-ITUR, and TItheridge temperature models) and multi-observations (GPS, Ionosondes, Topex, DMSP, FORMOSAT, and CHAMP) in this paper. Several conclu- sions are obtained from our comparisons. The modeled electron density and elec- tron and ion temperatures are quantitatively in good agreement with those of em- pirical models and observations. TIME-IGGCAS can model the electron density variations versus several factors such as local time, latitude, and season very well and can reproduce most anomalistic features of ionosphere including equatorial anomaly, winter anomaly, and semiannual anomaly. These results imply a good base for the development of ionospheric data assimilation model in the future. TIME-IGGCAS underestimates electron temperature and overestimates ion tem- perature in comparison with either empirical models or observations. The model results have relatively large deviations near sunrise time and sunset time and at the low altitudes. These results give us a reference to improve the model and enhance its performance in the future.

【基金】 Supported by the KIP Pilot Project of CAS (Grant No. kzcx2-yw-123);National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 40636032 and 40725014);National Key Basic Research Project of China (Grant No. 2006CB806306)
  • 【文献出处】 Science in China(Series E:Technological Sciences) ,中国科学(E辑:技术科学)(英文版) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2008年03期
  • 【分类号】P352
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】24
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络