节点文献

袁枚论考据——从《神仙不解考据》说起

Yuan Mei’s Discussion on Textual Research——Beginning with Textual Research Intangible to Immortals

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 邓瑞全张振利

【Author】 DENG Rui-quan,ZHANG Zhen-li (Ancient Books Institute,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

【机构】 北京师范大学古籍研究所北京师范大学古籍研究所 北京100875北京100875

【摘要】 清代乾嘉时期是中国传统学术整理和总结时期,一反宋明以来理学空疏的流弊,乾嘉学者以经世致用为价值取向,崇尚朴实的汉学。伴随汉学的兴盛,考据之风大行其道。尽管袁枚是乾嘉诗坛盟主、性灵派主将,然而身处这种学术空气中的他也很难与考据学彻底划清界线。看似游戏之笔的《子不语·神仙不解考据》,也可视为袁枚的考据札记。正是由于他并非以考据名家,使他对考据的评论更具不可忽视的学术价值。袁枚能够不囿于门户之见,较为公允地评价汉学、宋学的优劣短长,并能够吸收汉学、宋学各自的长处并融汇贯通,因此取得了超出同时代学者的成就。

【Abstract】 Qianlong’s reign of Qing dynasty is an era of arrangement and summarization of the traditional Chinese learning,just the opposite of Lixue,a hollow academic trend in the Song dynasty.Scholars in Qianlong and Jiaqing’s reigns took pragmatism as their values and upheld an unadorned Chinese study.With the prosperity of Chinese study,textual research boomed.Yuan Mei,as the chief poet in Qianlong and Jiaqing’s times and master of Nature and Soul school,found it difficult to tell himself from the Textual Research school. At the first sight,No words,Textual Research Intangible to Immortals is a game of words.However,it can also be seen as Yuan’s notebook of reading.It is because he wasn’t famed as a textual researcher that his comments on textual research are of great academic value.Yuan could sit on the fence and be fair to all the merits and drawbacks of Han study and Song study.Meanwhile,he digested and harmonized the merits of Han study and Song study for his own research,and therefore his achievements outweighed the contemporary scholars.

  • 【文献出处】 广州城市职业学院学报 ,Journal of Guangzhou City Polytechnic , 编辑部邮箱 ,2008年01期
  • 【分类号】I206.2
  • 【下载频次】181
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络