节点文献

“测谎”结论能否作为鉴定证据——关于中国心理测试技术研究应用及其现状的思考

Whether the Conclusion of Polygraph Test can be used as Litigate Evidence——Concerns about the Research and Application of Situation of Criminal Psychological Test Skills

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 武伯欣张泽民

【Author】 Wu Boxin, Zhang Zemin. Chinese People’s Public Security University,Beijing 100038

【机构】 中国人民公安大学甘肃政法学院犯罪心理测试中心《人民公安报》

【摘要】 "测谎",是日常概念,绝非科学术语。其科学称谓是犯罪心理测试技术,可简称心理测试技术或心测技术。测试结果能否作为证据,说法很多。中国心理测试技术研究与应用的现状,不容乐观;研讨其证据价值,必须首先对此状况及问题有深入了解。鉴于目前的混乱状况,将心理测试技术作为我国诉讼证据的条件尚不成熟。

【Abstract】 Polygraph test is a term used in common life, but absolutely not a scientific one. Criminal psy-chological test skills, the professional name, or simply called brain test skills, have being debated weather can be used as litigation evidence. We can not hold optimistic attitude toward the situation of research and application of criminal psychological test skills today. To discuss the evidence value of these skills, we have to make a in-depth exploration to this field first. Because of current confused circumstance, it is still not proper time to apply such skills as a kind of litigate evidence.

  • 【分类号】D918.5;D915.3
  • 【被引频次】44
  • 【下载频次】1662
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络