节点文献

吉西他滨联合化疗一线治疗晚期胰腺癌生存结果的亚组meta分析

Subgroup Meta-analyses of Survival Rate of Gemcitabine-based Combination Chemotherapy as First-line Therapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 谢德荣梁汉霖杨琼江志敏郭双双陈邓林毕卓菲

【Author】 XIE De-rong1,LIANG Han-Lin2,YANG Qiong1,JIANG Zhi-Min1,GUO Shuang-Shuang1, CHEN Deng-Lin1,BI Zhuo-fei1(1.Department of Oncology,The Second Affiliated Hospital,SUN Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,China; 2.Department of Chemotherapy,Zhongshan People′s Hospital,SUN Yat-sen University,Zhongshan 528403,China)

【机构】 中山大学附属第二医院肿瘤科中山大学附属中山市人民医院化疗科中山大学附属第二医院肿瘤科 广东广州510120广东中山528403广东广州510120

【摘要】 【目的】Meta分析提示吉西他滨(GEM)联合化疗一线治疗晚期胰腺癌优于标准的GEM单药化疗,在此基础上进行亚组生存结果的meta分析及资料更新,旨在寻找确切有效的化疗方案。【方法】通过MEDLINE、EMBASE、ASCO、ECCO等数据库及论文集检索相关文献。按纳入标准筛选新增文献并进行资料更新。主要对各亚组进行半年生存率、其次是1年生存率的meta分析。【结果】17个随机对照临床试验(RCT)共3 821例患者纳入分析,按化疗方案分为GEM联合顺铂(GEMDDP)、GEM固定剂量率输注联合奥沙利铂(GEMOX)、联合5FU(GEMFU)、联合卡培他滨(GEMCAP)以及联合伊立替康(GEMIRI)等5个亚组,各亚组半年生存率的治疗优势(RD)分别为5%(P=0.24)、9%(P=0.005)、2%(P=0.46)、7%(P=0.03)和-1%(P=0.88);1年生存率RD为6%(P=0.11)、5%(P=0.07)、4%(P=0.19)、5%(P=0.08)和0(P=0.97)。【结论】现有的证据提示GEMOX、GEMCAP联合化疗方案一线治疗晚期胰腺癌,有较好的应用前景,值得进一步的临床试验。

【Abstract】 【Objective】 Previous meta-analyses had shown gemcitabie(GEM)-based combination chemotherapy was superior to GEM monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer(APCa),Subgroup analyses were performed using updated information to seek for the exactly effective GEM-based combination regimen to benefit patients with APCa.【Methods】 Subgroup meta-analyses of all previously published or unpublished studies were performed with a comprehensive search of the updated literature including MEDLINE,EMBASE,ASCO and ECCO.The analyses included all randomized evidence to compare GEM combination chemotherapy with GEM alone with respect to 6-month survival rate(6-mo SR) and 1-year survival rate(1-y SR) in APCa patients.【Results】 Seventeen RCTs involving 3821 patients were included in this meta-analysis,which were divided into five subgroups according to the combination chemotherapy regimen,GEM plus cisplatin(GEMDDP),fixed-dose rate infusion of GEM plus oxaliplatin(GEMOX),GEM plus 5-fluorouracil(GEMFU),GEM plus capecitabine(GEMCAP) and GEM plus irinotecan(GEMIRI).Subgroup analyses showed the risk difference(RD) of 6-mo SR were 5%(P=0.24),9%(P=0.005),2%(P=0.46),7%(P=0.03) and-1%(P=0.88),respectively;and the 1-y SR 6%(P=0.11),5%(P=0.07),4%(P=0.19),5%(P=0.08),and 0%(P=0.97),respectively.【Conclusion】 Based on the available evidence,GEMOX and GEMCAP regimens may be considered promising regimen as the front-line therapy for APCa,which encourages further clinical trials.

  • 【文献出处】 中山大学学报(医学科学版) ,Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University(Medical Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年05期
  • 【分类号】R735.9
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】532
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络