节点文献

撤销许可的法律性质及效力研究——以撤销司法鉴定许可为例

The Legal Nature and the Force Effect of License Revocation

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 蔺耀昌胡丙超

【Author】 LIN Yao-chang, HU Bing-chao (1.Law School of Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210009; 2.Institute of Rule by Law of Local Districts and Regional Cooperation of Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210009)

【机构】 南京工业大学法学院南京工业大学地方法治与区域合作研究院 江苏南京210009副教授、在职博士生江苏南京210009

【摘要】 基于撤销的理由、目的和法律效果,撤销许可分为两类:一类是已经生效但在成立时即存在瑕疵的行政许可事后被撤销;另一类是合法的行政许可因被许可人在获得许可后从事违法行为而被撤销。撤销许可很有可能构成一种行政处罚,但并非所有的撤销许可都是行政处罚。司法行政机关以申请人提供虚假信息或隐瞒真实信息而骗取许可登记为由撤销许可,在本质上属于行政处罚。该撤销许可不具有溯及力,也不影响司法鉴定机构在撤销许可前出具的、被司法机关采信的司法鉴定文书的效力。

【Abstract】 According to the reason, purpose and legal effect of revocation, license revocation can be divided into two types: one type refers to the license that is valid but is revoked for some flaws itself; the other represents the valid licenses that are revoked for the unlawful actions of the applicants. License revocations, not all of them, probably will cause administrative penalty. In cases that the judicial branch and the administrative department revoke a license that is taken by cheating with false information and real information hiding, the revocation is substantially an administrative penalty. This kind of revocation has no retroactive effect and can not affect the effect of the judicial expertise document that is provided by judicial expertise organizations before the revocation and is adopted by court.

  • 【文献出处】 行政法学研究 ,Administrative Law Review , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年04期
  • 【分类号】D922.1;D926.1
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】390
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络