【摘要】 IBM案和微软案都提出了一个问题,即通过一定方式将原本独立的两个或者两个以上的产品转变为"一个"产品是否是变相的搭售。因此对于非法搭售的认定而言,一个判断的前提是必须存在两个独立的产品,才可能构成搭售。而成功的产品整合会消灭原本独立的产品的独立性,从而不构成搭售。在认定是两个产品还是一个产品的问题上,形成了以需求为主、交易性质为辅的传统认定标准,但这一标准在IBM案和微软案中存在很大的局限性。因此,需要以促进创新为视角扩展传统标准。更多还原

【Abstract】 IBM case and Microsoft case raise the same question,namely,whether converting two or more independent products into "one" is a kind of tying or not.As far as tying is concerned,its precondition is that there are at least two independent products.Product integration will eliminate the independence of original separate products and convert them into a single product.That is not tying.As to how to identify one or two products,there is a standard of Demand Prevailing over Transaction,based on previous precedents.However,the standard is too limited to be applied to IBM case and Microsoft case.Therefore,such standard should be extended by renovation promotion.更多还原