节点文献

高频电泪道成形并改良穿线术与高频电泪道成形留置导管术的对比观察

Contrastive study of seton through lacrimal passage and intubation through lacrimal passage for obstructive diseases of lacrimal passage

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 温利辉岳江心韦炳煌陈旭麦燕芳

【Author】 WEN Li-hui,YUE Jiangxin,WEI Bing-huang,et al.//Department of Ophthalmology,The Second People’s Hospital of Guilin City,Guilin 541001,China

【机构】 桂林市第二人民医院眼科桂林市第二人民医院眼科 广西桂林541001广西桂林541001

【摘要】 目的:探讨泪道阻塞的两种治疗方法的手术效果。方法:将患者随机分为两组病例,一组行高频电泪道成形并改良穿线术;一组行高频电泪道成形留置导管术。结果:高频电泪道成形并改良穿线术组治愈率为60.34%,显效率为29.31%;高频电泪道成形留置导管术组治愈率为36.84%,显效率为33.33%。结论:高频电泪道成形并改良穿线术治疗效果优于高频电泪道成形留置导管术。

【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate two kinds of treatments(seton through lacrimal passage and intubation through lacrimal passage)for obstruction diseases of lacrimal passage.Methods:Patients in first group were treated with seton through lacrimal passage,and the second group were treated with intubation through lacrimal passage.Results:In first group,the cure rate was 60.34%,the effective rate was 29.31%.In the second group,the cure rate was 36.84%,the effective rate was 33.33%.Conclusion:The effect of seton through lacrimal passage is better than that of intubation through lacrimal passage.

【基金】 桂林市科技攻关课题资助(No.20050404)
  • 【文献出处】 华夏医学 ,Acta Medicinae Sinica , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年05期
  • 【分类号】R779.6
  • 【下载频次】16
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络