节点文献

两种包被方法在克仑特罗ELISA检测试剂盒中应用的比较

Comparing application of two blocking ways in clenbuterol ELISA kit

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吴宗学赵建红

【Author】 WU Zong-xue~1,ZHAO Jian-hong~2(1.Beijing Haidian Zhonghai Animal Health Science & Technology Co., Beijing 100081; 2.China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing 100081; China )

【机构】 北京海淀中海动物保健科技公司中国兽医药品监察所 北京100081北京100081

【摘要】 通过对 5 0 %抑制浓度 (IC50 )、回收率和变异系数的测定 ,对比了常规法和微波法包被的酶联板在克仑特罗ELISA检测试剂盒中的应用。检验结果表明 :常规法与微波法包被的酶联板的IC50 分别为 1 .0 8和 0 .96μg/L ,添加 1 μg/L克仑特罗猪尿的回收率分别为 90 %和 86%。两种方法包被的酶联板的板内变异系数均小于 8% ,板间变异系数均小于 1 2 %。试验证明 ,在ELISA试验中 ,微波法包被具有常规法包被相当的应用效果

【Abstract】 Two comparing tests of blocking microtiter plates in conventional and microwave method were done. The corresponding concentraions of calibration curve mid point(B/B0-50%) were 1.08 μg/L with the conventional method and 0.96 μg/L with the microwave method. The recovery rates were 90% and 86% at 1 μg/L of clenbuterol in pig urine, respectively. The interassay variations were both below 8% and the intraassay variations were both below 12%. The results showed that the two blocking methods have the same applicability.

【关键词】 微波法包被克仑特罗ELISA
【Key words】 microwaveblockclenbuterolELISA
  • 【文献出处】 中国兽药杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年01期
  • 【分类号】S859.84
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】161
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络