【摘要】 中国实施以创新为灵魂的科教兴国战略,还要请进"罗先生"(Logic)和"费先生"(Philosophy)。逻辑是科学理论对错的裁判,哲学是科学理论创新的教练。逻辑是思维对"质"的分辨,应重视逻辑学。逻辑学创新的若干成果:只要把矛盾律理解成思维的规则,就可认定理发师悖论、罗素悖论等一批悖论都是矛盾谬论。只要严格区分思维层次,可对排中律做出创新的解释,断定欧布里德悖论是佯悖,还可简化哥德尔定理的证明。用逻辑分析出天文学中的哈勃定律意味着宇宙间存在万有斥力,它与牛顿的万有引力定律相互矛盾。当前,科学创新(不包括技术创新)既缺乏市场的激励机制,更缺乏评价的法律制度,创新者没有平等的对话和申辩的权利。应改变"运动员"当"裁判"的局面,建立保护科学发现发明的法律制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 In China we are carrying out the stratagem of flourishing our country by science and education in the spirit of innovation, and we need to call for logic and philosophy. Logic is like a judge that can judge a theory right or wrong, while philosophy is like a coach that can innovate on a theory. Logic reflects the quality of thought, which should be paid more attention to. In the essay, I put forward some new points in the view of logic innovation: If we regard the law of contradiction as a thinking rule, we can conclude a group of paradoxes such as the barber paradox only are conflicting fallacies. If we grasp different levels of thought strictly, we can make an innovative explanation for law of excluded middle, conclude that the Eu-bulides paradox is pseudo, and simplify the proof of Godel’s theory. Hubble law in astronomy means there is gravitational repulsion in the universe, and it is in contradiction with Newton’s law of universal gravitation. Currently, we lack not only a marketable encouraging mechanism, but also an evaluating legal system of science innovation (not including technology innovation). Thus innovators have no right of impartial dialogue and explanation. We should try to change the situation of "athletes as judges", and appeal to set up a legal system in order to protect science inventions.更多还原