节点文献

帽式颈椎椎间融合器的生物力学性能研究

A biomechanical study of hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 顾宇彤贾连顺陈雄生袁文肖建如汪军崔淑芳李小慧

【Author】 GU Yutong,JIA Lianshun,CHENG Xiongshen,et al Department of Orthopaedics,Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032,China

【机构】 复旦大学附属中山医院骨科上海长征骨科医院上海长海医院放射科上海第二军医大学动物实验中心上海生物材料研究所 200032上海市200003200433200437

【摘要】 目的:测试自行研制的帽式颈椎椎间融合器(HCIFC)的生物力学性能,探讨其用于颈椎椎间融合的可行性。方法:个羊颈椎标本随机分为组,组,完整颈椎节段;组,自体三面皮质髂骨;组,486ABCHarmscage;D组,SyncageC;E组,Carboncage;F组,HCIFC。除A组外均完全切除C3/4椎间盘后置入以上颈椎内置物,进行生物力学测定,计算出各组平均刚度及体积相关刚度,并行统计学比较。结果:置入HCIFC后颈椎屈曲刚度显著增大,而伸展、侧屈和轴向旋转刚度无变化;SyncageC在各方向上的刚度均最大,HCIFC与Carboncage相似;HCIFC在屈曲、伸展和侧屈刚度上小于Harmscage,而轴向旋转刚度显著大于Harmscage。与移植的三面皮质髂骨相比,所有cage在体积相关刚度上均有显著增加。Harmscage在各个方向上的体积相关刚度显著大于其它cage,其次为SyncageC、HCIFC及Carboncage。结论:HCIFC可为颈椎椎间融合提供足够的初始生物力学稳定性。

【Abstract】 Objective:To evaluate the biomechanical effect of hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage(HCIFC).Method:48 goat cervical spines(C2-C5) were tested in flexion,extension,axial rotation,and lateral bending with a nondestructive stiffness method using a nonconstrained testing apparatus,and three-dimensional displacement was measured.Autologous iliac bone and cervical spine intervertebral fusion cage were implanted according to manufacturers′ information after complete discectomy(C3/4) was performed.Eight spines in each of the following groups were tested:intact,autologous iliac bone graft,Harms cage,Syncage C,Carbon cage and HCIFC.The mean apparent stiffness values were calculated from the corresponding load-displacement curves.Additionally,cage volume and volume-related stiffness was determined.Result:The stiffness of the Syncage C was statistically greatest in all directions.After implantation of HCIFC,flexion stiffness increased as compared with that of the intact motion segment.There was no significantly difference in stiffness between HCIFC and Carbon cage.The stiffness of HCIFC was statistically higher than that of Harms cage in axial rotation and significantly lower in flexion,extension and lateral bending.Volume-related stiffness of all cages was higher than that of iliac bone graft.Harms cage was highest in volume-related stiffness of all directions.Conclusion:HCIFC can provide enough primary stability for cervical intervertebral fusion.

【关键词】 颈椎椎间融合器生物力学
【Key words】 Cervical spineCageBiomechanics
  • 【文献出处】 中国脊柱脊髓杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年02期
  • 【分类号】R687.1
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】136
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络