【摘要】 南京十年时期 ,商人罢市呈现出与以往截然不同之态势。津沪两地商人或利用罢市手段与反日组织抗争以维护自身私利 ,或一致反对罢市倡议 ,或囿于战时环境而被迫罢市。民族主义运动中商人罢市行为或其主动性之缺失 ,既可归诸南京国民政府之压制性的民众运动政策 ,又与当时中国共产党的弱势地位及相关政策密不可分。有无罢市之举 ,主动抑或被动罢市 ,不应作为评判商人民族主义特异性之标尺更多还原

【Abstract】 The merchants’ strikes in the decade (1927—1937) took on some more distinctive features than before.The merchants in Tianjin went on strikes after the Jinan Massacre to object the Organization of Resistance Against Japan and demand that the nation-saving fund be reduced or even abograted.They resumed their business soon after their demand was met. While after the September 18th Incident, the students’ proposal of a shopkeepers’ strike in Shanghai against the aggression was rejected because of the merchants’ strong objection.Nevertheless the merchants in Shanghai were forced to hold strikes under the special circumstances of the war after the December 8th Incident. But soon they returned to normal not only for their own interests but also for the residents’ life in Shanghai and even the finacial order in China.Such being the case, one reason is that the strikes were banned by the government of KMT and the other is that the CPC wasn’t able to conduct propaganda and agitation for its being oppressed.In fact, the merchants had to consider their own interests though they had the same nationalist feelings as their fellow countryman. In conclusion lastly,whether they hold strikes or they hold the strikes positively or passively can’t be the criteria of the merchants’ nationalism.更多还原