节点文献
特发性间质性肺炎患者肺泡毛细血管膜弥散能力和肺毛细血管床容量的研究
The investigation of pulmonary membrane diffusing capacity and pulmonary capillary blood volume in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia
【摘要】 目的研究特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)患者肺泡毛细血管膜弥散能力(DM)和肺泡毛细血管床容量(VC)变化及特点。方法20例IIP患者作为观察组,包括寻常性间质性肺炎(UIP)及非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)各7例。24例健康志愿者为对照组。测定观察组及对照组的CO弥散量(DLCO)、比弥散量(DLCO/VA)、DM、VC及肺通气功能。结果观察组及对照组的FEV1分别为(72.44±13.61)%及(103.33±11.96)%(预计值),FVC为(74.80±20.59)%及(116.08±16.84)%(预计值),观察组均明显降低(P<0.001);FEV1/FVC分别为(80.00±7.99)%、(79.92±4.56)%,无显著性差异(P>0.05);DLCO分别为(13.64±4.20)mL·mmHg1·min1及(21.80±2.88)mL·mmHg1·min1,观察组明显降低(P<0.001);DLCO/VA分别为(4.49±1.16)mL·mmHg1·min1、(4.23±0.57)mL·mmHg1·min1,无显著性差异(P>0.05);DM分别为(30.17±19.61)mL·mmHg1·min1、(67.63±11.28)mL·mmHg1·min1,VC分别为(51.00±13.06)mL、(66.67±9.62)mL,观察组均明显降低(P<0.001,P<0.05)。UIP组与NSIP组上述参数均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论DLCO变化可由DM和VC变化共同影响。DM、VC变化也可不完全一致,DM降低时VC可正常甚至反而升高,DLCO却可能在正常范围。DM及VC测定可作为早期评价肺弥散功能损害敏感而有效的方法。
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate diffusion capacity of pulmonary capillary membrane and pulmonary capillary volume in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia(IIP).Methods Twenty patients with IIP were enrolled.IIP patients included 7 cases for both usual interstitial pneumonia(UIP)and NSIP respectively.Twenty-four healthy subjects matched by age and gender were enrolled as control.DLCO,DLCO/VA,DM,VC and spirometry were measured.Results [JP2]Spirometry test revealed that FEV1 were (72.44±13.61) % and (103.33±11.96)%,and FVC were (74.80±20.59) % and (116.08±16.84)%p in IIP patients and controls,respectively(P<0.001).On the other hand,FEV1/FVC was (80.00±7.99)% in IIP and (79.92±4.56)% in controls and no significant difference was found(P> 0.05).DLCO were (13.64±4.20) mL·mm Hg -1·min -1 in IIP patients and (21.80±2.88)mL·mm Hg -1·min -1 in controls with a significant decrease in IIP patinents (P<0.001).However,DLCO/VA was (4.49±1.16) mL·mm Hg -1·min -1 in IIP patients and (4.23±0.57) mL·mm Hg -1·min -1[JP] in controls and no significant difference was found(P> 0.05).DM was (30.17±19.61) mL·mm Hg -1·min -1 in IIP and (67.63±11.28) mL·mm Hg -1·min -1 in contols;VC was ( 51.00±13.06)mL in IIP and (66.67± 9.62)mL in controls respectively,whih significant decline in IIP (P<0.001,P< 0.05,respectively).No differences in those parameters were found between UIP and NSIP patients(P> 0.05).Conclusions Both DM and VC contribute to the variation of DLCO.However,DM and VC may change inconsistently,ie,VC may be normal or increased when DM decline resulting a relative normal DLCO.DM and VC may be applied as sensitive tools for detection of diffusion capacity of IIP patients at early stage.
- 【文献出处】 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年05期
- 【分类号】R563.1
- 【被引频次】1
- 【下载频次】85