【摘要】 目的探讨结核性渗出性胸腔积液治疗方式。方法123例中等量以上积液的结核性胸膜炎病人作为研究对象。患者按入院先后顺序随机分为3组。A组42例,胸腔置管引流并胸腔内注射微卡(母牛分枝杆菌菌苗);B组45例,单纯置管引流;C组36例,常规胸腔穿刺抽液每周1~2次。3组患者的化疗方案均为2HRZE(S)/4HR。C组口服强的松30 mg/d。治疗1个月检查。结果1个月A组胸液控制率95.3%,显效36例(85.7%),有效4例(9.6%),无效2例(4.7%),6个月总有效率100%;B组胸液控制率91.1%,显效36例(80%),有效5例(11.1%),无效4例(8.9%),6个月总有效率100%;C组胸液控制率66.6%,显效3例(8.3%),有效21例(58.3%),无效12例(33.3%),6个月总有效率83.3%。结论深静脉导管引流胸腔积液,注药与不注药无显著性差异,但明显优于常规胸穿抽液。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To probe the treatment means of tuberculosis pleural effusion.Method 123 received creating cases of tuberculosis pleurisy were divided into group A,B,and C at random,group A : 42 cases put drainage in the thorax and inject Vaccae in it,group B: 45cases put drainage in the thorax only,group C:36cases,carry aspiration for pleural effusion one or two times of a week.Three groups all use 2HRZE/4HR,and group C use Pedisorn 30?mg/d.Results After one month treating,the group A controlling rate is 95.3%,36(85.7%)have remarkable result,4(9.6%) have effective result,2(4.7%) have no effective,have effective result 100% after 6 months;The group B,controlling rate is 91.1%,36(80%)have remarkable result,5(11.1%) have effective result,4(8.9%) have no effective,have effective result 100% after 6 months;Group C: controlling rate is 66.6%,3(8.3%)have remarkable result,21(58.3%)have effective result,12(33.3%) have no effective,have effective result 83.3% after 6 months.Conclusion There have no remarkable difference of inject drug or no when put drainage in the thorax.更多还原