节点文献
青少年学校生活满意度评定问卷的设计与信度、效度评价
Development of School Life Satisfaction Rating Questionnaire for Adolescents and Its Reliability and Validity
【摘要】 目的编制青少年学校生活满意度问卷并评价其内部一致信度和重测信度,为开展生活满意度研究提供评价工具。方法从青少年对自己的学习效率与能力、老师和同学对自己的学习表现、师生及同学关系、从老师和同学那里获得的帮助、学习环境等的满意程度方面编制评定项目,以单个项目评分与总分Pearson相关系数≥0.50为初筛条件,确立12个项目构成青少年学校生活满意度问卷。以72名初二学生和61名高二学生间隔2周重测,评定该问卷的重测信度;运用该问卷对3 127名城乡中学生进行调查,计算Cronbachα系数,评价内部一致信度;分析学校生活满意度问卷与Zung焦虑自评量表、流调中心用抑郁自评量表评分的相关及其与危害健康行为的关系。以人口统计学特征和学校生活满意度为自变量,分别以抑郁、焦虑症状、危害健康行为为因变量,进行Logistic回归分析。结果该问卷2次评分Pearson相关系数为0.91,Cronbachα系数为0.829。该问卷总分与Zung焦虑自评量表和流调中心用抑郁自评量表评分的相关系数分别为-0.464和-0.279(P=0.000)。吸烟、饮酒、打架、无保护性行为等12项危害健康行为中,具有危害行为较多的男生,学校生活满意度评分显著低于没有或危害健康行为较少的个体;有自杀意念、自杀计划和自杀未遂的中学女生,学校生活满意度评分显著低于对照组。结论青少年学校生活满意度问卷有较好的信度和效度,可用于青少年心理健康的评定。
【Abstract】 Objective To develop School Life Satisfaction Rating Questionnaire for Adolescents and evaluate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire,and to provide evaluation instrument for the researches on life satisfaction.Methods The questionnaire investigated students’ responses to five issues(self-perceived study efficiency and ability,self-perceived evaluation by teachers and peers,relationships with teachers and peers,help from teachers and peers,satisfaction with study environment).Pearson correlation coefficients with each item≥0.50 were set as filtering criterion.Through the evaluation among the middle school students,12 items were confirmed to construct School Life Satisfaction Rating Questionnaire.The questionnaire was firstly administered in 72 junior middle school students and 61 senior middle school students to evaluate test-retest validity,and then administered to 3 127 middle school students living in urban or rural areas.Cronbach α value was calculated to evaluate the internal consistency reliability.The correlations were analyzed between the questionnaire and SAS, SDS and the health-risk behaviors.Logistic regression analysis was conducted, with independent variables of demographic characters and school life satisfaction and dependent variables of anxiety and depression symptoms and health-risk behaviors.Results Pearson correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.91,standardized Cronbach α was(0.829.)Correlations between school life satisfaction score with SAS and SDS were-0.464 and-0.279,respectively(P=0.000).Boys with more health-risk behaviors,as smoking,drinking,fighting,unprotected sexual behavior,and girls with either suicidal ideation,suicidal plans or suicidal attempts,had lower school life satisfaction scores than their peers.Conclusion School Life Satisfaction Rating Questionnaire for Adolescents can be used in evaluating adolescent mental health for its high validity and reliability.
【Key words】 Questionnaires; Psychometrics; Psychology,medical; Adolesscence;
- 【文献出处】 中国学校卫生 ,Chinese Journal of School Health , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年12期
- 【分类号】G635.5
- 【被引频次】123
- 【下载频次】2535