节点文献
试析马克思股份制理论的两次曲折
An Analysis on Two Reverses of Theory on Marxist Share System
【摘要】 从“两权分离”出发导出股份制财产是社会财产的论断,是马恩股份制理论的精髓部分。希法亭《金融资本》作为最早以马克思主义名义分析帝国主义的专著,完全否定了马恩股份制理论的精髓,全盘否定了股份制。列宁《帝国主义论》沿着《金融资本》的思路,也完全否定股份制,在政治上给十月革命提供了理论根据,但在理论上却存在不足之处,使股份制成为帝国主义专利品,使社会主义国家经济建设远离股份制实践。党的十六届三中全会《决定》以及贯彻落实《决定》的伟大实践,使股份制在理论和实践上步入正确轨道。
【Abstract】 The share system property inferred from two power separation is a judgment on social property forming the essence part of Marx Engels′ share system. Hiferding′s Financial Capital, which is the earliest treatise to analyze imperialism in the name of Marxism, totally repudiates the essence of Engels′ theory on share system and the share system itself accordingly. Lenin′s Theory on Imperialism, which follows the train of thought of Financial Capital, completely repudiates the share system as well. Though this viewpoint offers theoretical basis for the October Revolution politically, there exist extremes theoretically, thus making the share system an Imperialist patent, and the economic construction of social country away from the practice of share system. The Decision of the Third Plenary Session of the Sixteenth Central Committee of the CPC together with the great practice of carrying out the Decision has made the share system step onto the right track theoretically and practically.
【Key words】 Hiferding; Lenin; Financial Capital; Theory on Imperialism; share system;
- 【文献出处】 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年02期
- 【分类号】F091.91
- 【下载频次】162