节点文献
再论罪名变更的法理基础及其模式选择——刑事一体化角度的思考
On the Legal Bases and Optional Models for the Institution of Imputation Change in the Perspective of Integrative Criminal Legal System
【摘要】 在法院能否变更起诉指控的罪名以及如何变更起诉指控罪名的问题上,一些国家和地区存在着立法上的差别和理论上的分野。我国目前在程序设计上对法院的罪名变更权缺乏制约,理论界提出的种种改革方案也都值得商榷。我国罪名变更制度的建构,应当立足于我国特有的法文化传承和法治土壤,应当建立以四要件犯罪构成模式为基石并与诉因制度相整合的“诉因制度本土化”模式。
【Abstract】 There are many judicial and theoretical differences concerning the issue whether or not the court can change the imputation and how to change it in some countries and regions. In China, the criminal procedure gives the court unrestricted power to change the imputation, and theoretical reform programs are in need of further discussion. The authors hold that the judicial program for our legal institution of imputation change should be based on our own legal culture, legal system, and the four-crime-elements, and then conform to the system of counts.
【Key words】 criminal procedure; schism between prosecution and court; imputation change; elements of crime; system of counts;
- 【文献出处】 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ,Journal of Sichuan University(Social Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年03期
- 【分类号】D925.2
- 【被引频次】33
- 【下载频次】811