节点文献

挑针疗法治疗颈椎病56例疗效观察

Treatment of Cervical Spondylopathy by Needle Pricking: A Clinical Observation of 56 cases

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 符文彬张洪来樊莉李滋平朱晓平米建平李伟雄郭元琦蒙昌荣

【Author】 FU Wen - bin, ZHANG Hong - lai, FAN Li, et al. (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of TCM, Guang zhou 510120, China)

【机构】 广州中医药大学第二附属医院针灸科广州中医药大学第二附属医院针灸科 广东广州510120广东广州510120广东广州510120

【摘要】 目的:观察挑针疗法治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法:将158例颈椎病患者随机分为3组。挑针治疗组 56例,采用挑针疗法治疗;局麻对照组47例,采用利多卡因皮下注射治疗;针刺对照组55例,采用常规针 刺治疗。结果:挑针治疗组与局麻对照组、针刺对照组疗效比较,差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05);针刺对照 组与局麻对照组疗效比较,差异也有显著性意义(P<0.05)。证属气滞血瘀型疗效挑针治疗组与局麻对照组、 针刺对照组比较,差异均有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。治疗前后疼痛指数(PRI)评分变化挑针治疗组与局麻 对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:挑针疗法治疗颈椎病是一种高效、安全的疗法。

【Abstract】 Objective: To observe the curative effect of needle pricking (NP) for cervical spondylopathy(CS). Methods: 158 cases of CS were allocated to 2 group randomly. The NP group(56 cases) was treated by NP; local anesthesia (LA) group (47 cases) by subcutaneous injection of lidocaine; acupuncture (A) group (55 cases) by routine acupuncture as control. Results: The curative effects of 3 groups were compared, and the difference was significant ( P < 0. 05), and the difference between A group and LA group was also significant (P < 0. 05). For those with syndromes attributive to stagnation of qi and blood, the curative effect was significantly different in three groups (P < 0.01), and also between A group (P< 0. 01). The scoring of painful response index (PRI) before and after treatment was significantly different between NP group and LA group ( P < 0. 01). Conclusion: NP is highly effective and safe for CS.

【基金】 广东省中医药局资助课题(编号:101058)
  • 【文献出处】 新中医 ,New Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年04期
  • 【分类号】R246
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】277
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络