节点文献

预成根管钉铸造桩修复后的牙根抗折力实验研究

An in vitro comparison of fracture resistance between canal pin and casted post and core reconstructed restored teeth

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 方达龙邬继东项立新王性立朱云鹏丁亚莉

【Author】 FANG Da-long,WU Ji-dong, XIANG LI-Xin, WANG Xing-li, ZHU Yun-peng, DING Ya-li.(D epartment of Stomatology, Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang 310013,china) [

【机构】 浙江医院口腔科浙江大学工程力学系明嘉诊所浙江医院口腔科 主治医师浙江310013主任医师浙江310013副主任医师浙江310013高级工程师浙江310013助理医师浙江310013主管护师浙江310013

【摘要】 目的:比较相同条件下前后牙铸造桩核和预成根管钉修复后牙根的抗折力。方法:在离体牙根上用铸造桩核或预成根管钉修复后,通过电子万能材料试验机测定载荷抗压强度。结果:前牙预成根管钉和铸造桩核修复二组间抗压强度差异有显著性差异(P<0.05);后牙预成根管钉和铸造桩核修复二组间抗压强度差异无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:前牙铸造桩核修复后的牙根比预成根管钉修复后的牙根具有更大抗折力;后牙二种修复后抗折力相同。

【Abstract】 Objective: To compare the fracture resistances between of anterio r or posterior teeth reconstructed restored with canal pins and those with caste d and post cores under the same conditions. Methods: Compressive strength of rec onstructed restored teeth in vitro with canal pins or post and cores were tested by an electronic material test machine. Results: The compressive strength of an terior roots with post and cores were larger higher than those with canal pins(P <0.05).But there was not significant difference between posterior roots with pos t and cores and those with canal pins(P>0.05). Conclusions: Anterior roots with post and cores were stronger than those with canal pins, and there was not diff erent compressive strength between post cores and canal pins in the posterior ro ots.

【关键词】 预成根管钉铸造桩核抗折力离体牙根
【Key words】 canal pinpost and coreresistanceteeth in vitro
  • 【文献出处】 口腔颌面修复学杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年02期
  • 【分类号】R783
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】63
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络