节点文献

不同栓塞剂治疗支扩大咯血的比较研究

Comparison of the effectiveness of different embolic agents for treating bronchiectasis with massive hemoptysis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 何冰峰曹振远陈颖邬艳慧

【Author】 HE Bing-feng,CAO Zhen-yuan,CHEN Ying,WU Yan-hui.Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150001,China

【机构】 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一临床医学院放射科哈尔滨医科大学附属第一临床医学院放射科 150001150001

【摘要】 目的探讨并比较不同栓塞剂治疗支扩大咯血中、远期疗效。方法32例支扩大咯血行支气管动脉栓塞术,分别使用PVA和明胶海绵(GS)颗粒两种栓塞材料。评价栓塞后的近期、中远期疗效,按照栓塞材料进行分组对照、统计分析。结果32例行支气管动脉栓塞术,应用PVA和GS栓塞剂各16例。随访29例,有8例复发,其中GS颗粒栓塞组7例,PVA颗粒栓塞组1例。结论作为治疗支扩大咯血的栓塞剂,PVA颗粒优于GS颗粒;500μm左右的PVA颗粒值得推荐。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate and conpare the immediate and long-term results of bronchial artery embolization(BAE) with different embolic agents for treating bronchiectasis accompaneid by massive hemoptysis.Methods BAE was undertaken in 32 patients with hemoptysis.Particles of PVA or gelatin sponge were used separately as embolic agents.Immediate and long-term results were evaluated separately by the different embolic agents. Results BAE was taken in 32 patients with hemoptysis dividing into two groups with 16 for each group alternatively received GS or PVA.One patient had recurrence at the 3rd day of BAE.29 patients were followed up and 8 of them had recurrent hemoptysis including 7 embolized with GS,and 1 PVA.Conclusions As embolic agents to treat bronchiectasis with massive hemoptysis,the effect of PVA is better than that of GS.500 μm PVA is the best of choice.

  • 【文献出处】 介入放射学杂志 ,Journal of Interventional Radiology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年06期
  • 【分类号】R562.22
  • 【被引频次】43
  • 【下载频次】138
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络