【摘要】 在全球化时代,现代性的危机表现得尤为紧迫和严重。全球化语境下对现代性的反思表现出新的特征,哈贝马斯和利奥塔的现代性之争突出反映了这一特征。对理性的不同态度使哈贝马斯和利奥塔分别提出了重建现代性与重写现代性的不同构想;在完成各自的构想过程中,哈贝马斯采用了普遍语用学的方法,重建普遍交往理性,利奥塔则用语言游戏的方法解构普遍理性;哈贝马斯为现代性设计了一个美好的交往乌托邦,利奥塔则终结了现代性的乌托邦理想。文章对哈贝马斯与利奥塔的现代性之争进行了辩证的分析,认为在全球普遍交往实践基础上形成的交往理性超越了哈贝马斯与利奥塔的现代性视域,为现代性危机的解决提供了一种思路。更多还原

【Abstract】 At the age of globalization, the crisis of modernity is urgent and serious. Under the globalization context, the introspection to the modernity shows the new feature. And the debate between Jean-Francis lyotard and Jurgen Habermas about the modernity just stresses this feature. The different attitude of the two famous scholars held to rationality make them put forward different thoughts that are reconstructing modernity and rewriting modernity. In the thoughts of their own to the modernity, Habermas uses the method of universal pragmatics, reconstructing universal communicative rationality, while Lyotard takes the language game to deconstruct universal rationality. Habermas design a beautiful communicative Utopia to modernity, however Lyotard want to make the Utopian ideal end.The paper uses the fundamental principle and the method of Marxism philosophy to dialectically analyze the debate. Marxism of communicational rationality, which is formed on the basis of global communicational practice, surpassed the horizon of Habermas and Lyotard’ s concepts of modernity, and insists on the unity of modernity’ s universality and variety, therefore it provides a theoretical guide for the resolution of the crisis in modernity.更多还原