【摘要】 目的观察、比较科雷氏骨折3种外固定方法的利弊。方法将在门诊治疗的157例患者,按外固定方法的不同自然分为3组,即石膏组、小夹板组、纸夹板组。观察每组完全消肿的时间、骨折再移位和张力性水疱的发生率以及达到临床愈合所需的时间。结果石膏组消肿快、发生再移位和水疱者少见、愈合时间短、分别与另外两组比较,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论石膏固定仍是科雷氏骨折最可靠的外固定法。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To observe and comparare the advantage and disadvantage of three types of external immobilization for treatment of Colle’s fracture. Methods In this study 157 outpaitents of Colle’s fracture were divided into three groups randomly as plaster cast wood splint and card board splint group. For each group the duration of swelling the occurrence rate of redisplacement of fracture and develping of tensive bleb and the time needed for fracture healing were observed and compared. Results In the plaster cast group it was observed that the subsidence of swelling occurred most early the redisplacement of fracture and tensive bleb developing were not common and the fracture healing needed less time. Compared with the other two groups respectively there was a significantly statistic difference P<0.05. Conclusions Plaster cast is a more reliable external immobilization for the fracture of Colle’s.更多还原