节点文献

我国证据种类的反思与重构

Rethink and Reconstruct the Sorts of Evidence in China

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张嘉军张红战

【Author】 ZHANG Jia-jun1, ZHANG Hong-zhan2(1.Law School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064;2. The Municipal People’s Procuratorate of Kaifeng, Kaifeng 475001)

【机构】 四川大学法学院开封市检察院 四川成都610064河南开封475001

【摘要】 在借鉴前苏联相关制度基础上建构的我国现行证据种类 ,并不具有科学合理性 ,根本原因在于我国欠缺科学合理的证据种类划分标准。如何科学建构证据种类划分标准则是如何建构科学合理证据种类之关键所在。本文在科学建构证据种类划分标准基础上对我国证据种类予以重构。

【Abstract】 China’s sorts of evidence were built up on the basis of the former Soviet Union’s related theories. The author considers that this is neither scientific nor reasonable, because there is not a scientific and reasonable standard of differentiating the sorts of evidence. How to construct a standard of differentiating the sorts of evidence scientifically is directly related to how to construct sorts of evidence correctly. This article reconstructs the sorts of evidence on the basis of constructing standard of differentiating the sorts of evidence scientifically.

【关键词】 证据种类反思重构
【Key words】 the sorts of evidencerethinkreconstruct
  • 【文献出处】 甘肃政法学院学报 ,Journal of Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年02期
  • 【分类号】D925
  • 【被引频次】18
  • 【下载频次】1055
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络