节点文献
不同方法对烧伤高热降温效果比较
Comparison of Effects on the Hi-heat Cooling of Burn in Different Ways
【摘要】 目的为有效地治疗和护理烧伤高热,探讨三种不同方法对烧伤高热病人的降温效果。方法将90例烧伤高热病人,随机分为静脉滴注低温液体组,药物降温组,物理降温组,以三组病人60min内体温恢复率、体温反复率、5天以内体温恢复率、降温无效率等指标进行对照观察。结果三组比较60min内体温恢复率以药物降温为佳(P<0.01);体温反复率以静脉滴注低温液体组最低;5天以内体温恢复率以静脉滴注低温液体组最高(P<0.05),降温无效率,静脉滴注低温液体组最低。结论静脉滴注低温液体是一项有效、安全的降温方法,适合烧伤高热病人应用。
【Abstract】 Objective In order to cure and nurse the patients of burn and hi-heat , to explore the cooling effects on the patients of burn and hi-heat in 3 different ways. Methods 90 cases of burn and hi-heat were randomly divided into intravenous drip hypothermia liquid group, drug cooling group and physical cooling group . The indexes , such as the recovery ratio( in 60 minutes), reiteration ratio (in 60 minutes), the recovery ratio(in 5 days) and cooling inefficacy ratio( in 5 days), were compared and observed. Results The recovery ratio was the best in the drug cooling group in an hour(p<0.01); the temperature reiteration ratio was the lowest in the intravenous drip hypothermia liquid group; the temperature recovery ratio in 5 days was the highest in the intravenous drip hypothermia liquid group (p<0.05); the cooling inefficacy ratio was the lowest in the intravenous drip hypothermia liquid group.Conclusion The intravenous drip hypothermia liquid is an effective and safe cooling method. It adapts to the patients of burn and hi-heat.
【Key words】 Burn Hypapyrexia Hypothermia liquid Druy Cooling Physical Cooling;
- 【文献出处】 国际医药卫生导报 ,International Medicine & Health Guidance News , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年10期
- 【分类号】R644
- 【下载频次】66