【摘要】 莫雷和Robins对于“材料模式、认知负荷对学生类比推理迁移的影响”所做的实验 ,其结果存在着明显的差异 :莫雷的结论支持积极的反应理论 ,Robins的结论支持积极的学习理论。为了确定差异产生的原因和条件 ,以及他们的结论正确与否 ,我们通过实验作了进一步验证。通过对数据进行方差分析和多重比较得出结论 :(1)莫雷和Robins的实验结论所产生的主要差异是由于他们所选择的被试存在着较大的年龄差别 ;(2 )积极的学习理论和积极的反应理论并不是相互矛盾的 ,而是有各自成立的前提条件 ,二者各适用于不同的年龄阶段。更多还原

【Abstract】 MoLei and Robins all have done the experiment of “The effects of Material Schema and Cognitive Load on Analogical Reasoning Transfer of Students’".But they had very different conclusion. In order to know why this conclusion had been obtained, we made another exerperiment.In this exerperiment we made statistics by means of variance analysis and multi comparison to this experimental data, and the conclusion is: (1)The experimental results of MoLei and Robins are tenable under different age’s condition.(2)“Theory of active learning" and “Theory of active response" are all right, but they exist in the different condition.更多还原