【摘要】 讨论中国史学的历史进程,应该包括历史观念史。困难在于,从史学史的角度,陈述历史观念史,与一般的中国思想史或中国哲学史的分工,如何体现?本文注意到,中国传统史学,常由传统医学那里借用某种经验型的权威理念,例如司马迁征引春秋晚期已流传的“上医医国,其次疾人”观念,直到清末还不断被以史论作政论的作者援用。司马迁意在批判汉武帝君臣滥用权力与民争利而导致“国病”不治的经济政策。然而它的历史效应,在易代之后的盐铁会议上便已凸显。因此本文通过司马迁将扁鹊传奇和仓公医案相结合的专门史的文本考察,尝试探讨作为史学史题中应有之义的历史观念史的研究方法,或为愚者一得。更多还原

【Abstract】 The history of historical idea is undoubtedly a part of the history of Chinese historiography. The difficulty lies in how to distinguish it from the intellectual history or the history of Chinese philosophy. As indicated here, traditional Chinese history often took advantage of authoritative Chinese medical theories, such as the concept of “second rate doctors cure disease of human body while first rate doctors heal disease of society”, which prevailed in late Spring and Autumn Period and had been frequently cited until late Qing Dynasty. Sima Qian cited this concept to criticize the Emperor Hanwu and his officials abusing their power to enact new economic policies to deprive the people. And the Yantie Conference later in the Eastern Han embodied the influence of Sima Qian’s criticism. Through a textual study of Sima Qian’s legend of Bian Que in the light of Canggong medical treatment, the author attempts to get a point by exploring the research method of the history of historical idea.更多还原