【摘要】 目的 :探讨精神分裂症患者的防御方式、父母教养方式及亲密度和适应性的特点。方法 :采用防御方式问卷 (DSQ)、父母教养方式评价量表 (EMBU)及家庭亲密度和适应性量表 (中文版 ) (FACESII-CV)对 80例精神分裂症患者 (研究组 )进行了问卷调查 ,并与 80例正常受试者 (对照组 )加以比较。结果 :①研究组中间型和不成熟防御方式因子分均明显高于对照组 (P <0 .0 1) ,而成熟防御方式因子分则明显低于对照组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;②研究组父母的情感温暖因子分明显低于对照组 (P <0 .0 1) ,而惩罚及拒绝因子分则明显高于对照组 (P <0 .0 1) ,另外患者父亲的过分干涉及母亲的偏爱被试因子分亦均明显高于对照组 (前者P <0 .0 1,后者P <0 .0 5 )。③研究组家庭的实际亲密度、实际适应性、理想亲密度和理想适应性评分均明显低于对照组 (P <0 .0 1)。结论 :精神分裂症患者的防御方式、父母教养方式及亲密度和适应性与正常人有着明显的不同。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the defense style, parental rearing pattern and family adaptability and cohesion of patients with schizophrenia.Methods:Eighty patients with schizophrenia(the study group) and 80 normal controls(the control group) were assessed with the Defense Style Questionnaire(DSQ), Egna Minnenav Barndoms Uppfostran(EMBU)and Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale(FACESII-CV). Results:①The scores of DSQ neurotic defense factor and immature mechanism factor were higher in the study group than in the control group ( P <0.01).The scores of mature mechanism factor in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P <0.05).②Compared with normal controls, the scores of factors of being punished and refused of the study group were higher, at the same time, their scores of the over intervention of father and over partialness of mother were higher. However,the scores of factors of being cared was lower.③The fact and ideal scores of the family adaptability and cohesion in study group were lower than those of the control group ( P <0.01). Conclusion: There was significant difference between the schizophrenia and the normal group in the defense style, parental rearing pattern and family adaptability and cohesion.更多还原