节点文献

几种水处理方法对污水中病毒清除作用的评估

Evaluation on inactivation effectiveness of different water treatments on enteric viruses in wastewater

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吕欣; 尹文; 仇付国; 王晓昌; 雷迎峰; 杨敬; 薛小平;

【Author】 Lu Xin 1, YIN Wen 1 ,QIU Fu-guo 2,et al.Department of Microbiology,the Fourth Military Medical University(Xi′an 710032,China)

【机构】 第四军医大学微生物学教研室; 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院; 第四军医大学微生物学教研室 西安710032; 西安710032; 西安710032;

【摘要】 目的 评估不同水处理方法 (沉淀过滤法、超滤法、臭氧消毒法、氯消毒法 )对病毒的清除效果。方法 在污水中人为添加定量的柯萨奇病毒作为病毒指示剂 ,采用不同的水处理方法处理污水 ,以细胞培养法 ,细胞半数致死剂量 (TCID50 )为检测指标 ,检测各种水处理方法对柯萨奇病毒的清除效率。结果 臭氧消毒法对病毒清除最为有效 ,其次为沉淀过滤法与超滤法 ,氯消毒法效果不明显。结论 对污水中病毒的清除不能采用单一工艺 ,需多种工艺互补才能有效清除病毒

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the inactivation effectiveness of different water treatments(sediment filtration,ultra filtration,ozone disinfection and chlorine disinfection on enteric viruses in wastewater.Methods Cell-cultured coxsackie virus B3(CoxB3) was added to sterilize secondary efflluent as virus indicator,then the water sample was treated by different water treatments respectively,TCID 50 was used as test index to assess virus elimination of the four water treatment techniques.Results CoxB3 could be effectively controlled by adequate ozone disinfection practice.Sediment filtration and ultra filtration almoset had the same effec tiveness on virus elimination.Chlorine disinfection couldn′t achieve remarkable removal efficiency.Conclusion Ozone disinfection was one of the most effective ways to clean up wastewater,but enteric virus in wastewater can not be successfully eliminated by only one treatment,combination of physical treatments and chemical disinfection techniques were recommended.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金重点项目 (50 1 380 2 0 )
  • 【文献出处】 中国公共卫生 ,China Public Health , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年11期
  • 【分类号】R123
  • 【被引频次】8
  • 【下载频次】366
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络