节点文献

4种非甾体抗炎药治疗类风湿关节炎的成本-效果分析

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for rheumatoid arthritis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 施文王永铭李端李少丽颜敏陈斌艳程能能

【Author】 SHI Wen 1,WANG Yong-ming 1,LI Duan 1,LI Shao-li 2,YAN Min 2,CHEN Bin-yan 1,CHENG Neng-neng 1. ( 1. Department of Pharmacology,Fudan University,SHANGHAI 200032,China; 2. the Center for Drug Reevaluation and the Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring, State Food and Drug Administration,BEIJING 100061,China)

【机构】 复旦大学药学院药理教研室国家食品与药品监督管理局药品评价中心和药物不良反应监控中心复旦大学药学院药理教研室 上海200032上海200032北京100061上海200032

【摘要】 目的 :探讨 4种口服非甾体抗炎药治疗类风湿性关节炎 6mo的成本和效果。方法 :4 6 1例病人随机分成 4组 ,双氯芬酸组 131例 ,服用双氯芬酸 75~ 10 0mg·d- 1,萘丁美酮组 131例 ,服用萘丁美酮 10 0 0mg·d- 1,美洛昔康组 14 4例 ,服用美洛昔康 15mg·d- 1,塞来昔布组 5 5例 ,服用塞来昔布 2 0 0mg·d- 1,疗程均为 6mo。运用成本 -效果分析对 4组病人进行分析评价。结果 :双氯芬酸、萘丁美酮、美洛昔康、塞来昔布 4组完成疗程病例数分别为12 5 ,12 7,139和 5 5例。在疗程结束时 ,4组间疗效无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,塞来昔布组不良反应率明显低于其他 3组 (P <0 .0 1)。 4组总成本分别为(14 0 0±s 32 6 ) ,(15 31± 36 ) ,(2 0 18± 5 2 7) ,(32 2 5±76 7)元 ;成本 -效果比为 (2 0 4 1± 6 12 ) ,(2 5 6 0±6 81) ,(2 985± 70 6 ) ,(4 6 6 7± 1389)元·例 - 1;经敏感度分析后的成本 -效果比为 (1896± 4 5 5 ) ,(2 36 6±6 38) ,(2 6 6 9± 5 89) ,(3978± 96 3)元·例 - 1。结论 :双氯芬酸为治疗类风湿性关节炎的较佳方案 ,在经济许可的情况下 ,偏重考虑药物安全性 ,塞来昔布也是一个较佳选择。

【Abstract】 AIM: To evaluate the cost and efficacy of 4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the 6 mo treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Four hundred and sixty-one patients were randomly divided into 4 groups. One hundred and thirty-one patients of diclofenac group took diclofenac 75-100mg·d -1 . One hundred and thirty-one patients of nabumetone group took nabumetone 1000mg·d -1 . One hundred and forty-four patients of meloxicam group took meloxicam 15mg·d -1 . Fifty-five patients of celecoxib group took celecoxib 200mg·d -1 . The course of treatment was 6mo. Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate the cost and efficacy of four groups. RESULTS: There were 125,127,139,and 55 patients finished the study in diclofenac group,nabumetone group,meloxicam group and celecoxib group,respectively.There was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy of four groups ( P > 0.05 ) at the end of the study. The adverse reaction rate of celecoxib group was significantly lower than that of the other 3 groups( P <0.01). The total cost of 4 groups was (1400± s 326),( 1531± 36),(2018±527), and (3225±767) yuan,respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratios of curing per patient were (2041±612),(2560±681),(2985±706), and (4667±1389) yuan,respectively and became (1896±455),(2366±638),(2669±589),(3978±963) yuan after sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Diclofenac is an inexpensive and effective drug for RA. If budget allows, and considering drug safety,celecoxib is also an appropriate choice.

【基金】 国家食品与药品监督管理局药品评价中心和药物不良反应监控中心资助项目 (BK PJ 0 30 1)
  • 【文献出处】 中国新药与临床杂志 ,Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年08期
  • 【分类号】R593.22
  • 【被引频次】17
  • 【下载频次】477
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络