节点文献

噻奈普汀与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的对照研究

A comparative study of tianeptine and paroxetine for depressive patients

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 彭江发许玉梅朴胜斌

【Author】 Peng Jiangfa, Xu Yumei, Piao Shengbin. Kangning Hospital of Shenzhen,Guangdong 518020,China

【机构】 广东省深圳市康宁医院深圳市精神卫生研究所深圳市精神卫生研究所 518020518020

【摘要】 目的 比较噻奈普汀 (商品名达体朗 )与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的有效性和安全性。方法 将 6 8例符合CCMD 2 R诊断标准的抑郁症患者 ,随机分为噻奈普汀组与帕罗西汀组 ,治疗 6周。用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定疗效 ,用副反应量表 (TESS)评定副反应。结果 治疗 6周后噻奈普汀组和帕罗西汀组的有效率分别为 77%和 82 % ,二者比较差异无显著性。治疗 6周后两组HAMD总分及焦虑躯体化因子分 ,治疗前后比较差异均有显著性 ,两组间比较差异无显著意义。噻奈普汀组主要不良反应是嗜睡、口干等 ,与帕罗西汀组相比 ,差异无显著性。结论 噻奈普汀是安全、有效的抗抑郁药物

【Abstract】 Objective To compare efficacy and safety of tianeptine and paroxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.Methods Sixty-eight patients who met the criteria of CCMD-2-R for depressive disorder were randomly divided into two subgroups receiving treatment of tianeptine and paroxetine respectively for six weeks . The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAMD), and the safety was assessed by Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale ( TESS).Results The efficacy rates of the tianeptine group and the paroxetine group were 77% and 82%,respectively. There was no significant differance between two groups on efficacy rate. The scores of HAMD and the sub-scores of HAMD in anxiety somatization in two groups had significant differences between before and after treatment, no significant difference existed between two groups. The main adverse reactions of tianeptine group were drowsiness,dry mouth.Conclusion Tianeptine is an effective and well tolerated antidepressant.

【关键词】 噻奈普汀帕罗西汀抑郁症
【Key words】 Tianeptine Paroxetine Depression
  • 【文献出处】 山东精神医学 ,Shandong Archires of Psychiatry , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年04期
  • 【分类号】R749.4
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】49
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络