【摘要】 启蒙运动曾有过自己辉煌的历史,但由于过度强调理性与科学技术,最终走向了自己的反面,并给日后生态破坏合理化埋下了祸根。西方马克思主义者和生态女性主义者站在人类生存及发展的高度上,批判了人类中心主义、人类对自然的征服和男性文化霸权对女性的统治。阿多诺和霍克海默在《启蒙的辩证法》一书中解析了启蒙理性所走过的历程,以及理性的启蒙的自我毁灭和理性对人的统治悲剧。生态女性主义者则从女性与自然的渊源关系,批判了启蒙时期形成的二元思维方式、价值等级观念和统治的逻辑。无论是新马克思主义还是生态女性主义,其批判的宗旨就是要呼吁人类要共织生命之网,建立一个与自然相互依存的世界。更多还原

【Abstract】 The Enlightenment movement, with its own splendid history, overstressed the supremacy of rationality and science over nature, thus moving towards its own opposite, and planting the seeds of later rational destruction of nature. Both the Western Marxists and ecofeminists criticize anthropocentrism, its conquest of nature, and male cultural hegemony from the angle of human existence and development. In The Dialectic of the Enlightenment, Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer analyze the course of the Enlightenment, its self-destruction and the tragedy caused by rational domination of human beings. Ecofeminists criticize dualism, sense of hierarchy and logic of domination in terms of the close connection of women with nature. Their common aim is to reweave a net of life and establish a world interdependent with nature.更多还原