节点文献

麻黄及蜜麻黄超临界萃取物的化学成分比较

Comparative Study on Chemical Components of Supercritical Extracts from Herba Ephedrae and Honey-Prepared Herba Ephedrae

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 徐必达陈康林文津张华林

【Author】 XU Bida 1, CHEN Kang 2, LIN Wenjin 2, ZHANG Hualin 2 (1. The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of TCM, Guangzhou 510240, China; 2. Guangzhou University of TCM, Guangzhou 510405, China)

【机构】 广州中医药大学第三附属医院广州中医药大学广州中医药大学 广州510240广州510405广州510405

【摘要】 【目的】分析比较麻黄及蜜麻黄超临界萃取物的化学成分。【方法】采用超临界CO2 萃取技术 (SFE CO2 法 )从麻黄及蜜麻黄中提取挥发油 ,并用气相色谱 质谱联用 (GC MS)技术分离、鉴定 ,比较两者化学组成的不同。【结果】生麻黄中的硫酸二乙酯等 2 0种成分在蜜麻黄中没有检出 ,而在蜜麻黄中检测到羟甲基糠醛等 12种不同成分。挥发油得率 :麻黄2 1% ,蜜麻黄 1 0 %。【结论】麻黄与蜜麻黄超临界萃取物的化学成分有明显差异。

【Abstract】 To compare the chemical components of supercritical extracts from Herba Ephedrae and honey-prepared Herba Ephedrae. Volatile oils were extracted from Herba Ephedrae and honey-prepared Herba Ephedrae by supercritical CO 2 extraction and then identified by the combination of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Twenty kinds of components such as diethylsulfate obtained from Herba Ephedrae were not found in honey-prepared Herba Ephedrae and twelve different components such as hydroxymethylfurfural were obtained from honey-prepared Herba Ephedrae. The extraction rate of volatile oils was 2.1% in herba ephedrae and 1.0% in honey-prepared Herba Ephedrae. [ Conclusion]The components of supercritical extractions from Herba Ephedrae differ from those in honey-prepared Herba Ephedrae.

【基金】 国家科技部“十五”攻关课题 (编号 :2 0 0 1BA70 1A11)
  • 【文献出处】 广州中医药大学学报 ,Journal of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年03期
  • 【分类号】TQ461
  • 【被引频次】15
  • 【下载频次】396
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络