【摘要】 目的为临床急救工作探索一条更便捷、更实用、更易普及的常规人工通气方法,以提高急救工作的成功率。方法在急救工作中随机选择100例需急救气管插管者,比较运用喉罩内气管插管(intubating,LMA)与常规气管插管的所耗时间及成功率。结果急救者(非麻醉科医师)运用常规气管插管对病人进行人工通气成功率仅为9%,所费平均时间6min26s,其余以喉罩内气管插管对病人进行人工通气均获成功,所耗时间平均2min40s。结论喉罩内气管插管比现行常规气管插管更简易、更可靠、更易普及推广,前者可取代后者作为医疗常规的地位。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To explore a easier and more useful way in clinical intu bation. Method 100 emergency cases were randomly selected to compare the success ive rate and time required for conventional intubation and LMA intubation. Resul t The time required for conventiontal intubation is six minutes and twenty-six seconds, and two minutes and forty seconds for the LMA intubation. The successfu l rate of conventiontal intubation and LMA intubation are 9%and 100%respective ly. Conclusion LMA intubation is faster and has a higher successive rate than th e conventional intubation, and can be widely used in clinical practice.更多还原