节点文献

论将人身自由罚纳入行政处罚听证程序的必要性

On Necessity of Putting Personal Freedom Penalty into the Category of Administrative Hearing Procedure

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王聚涛

【Author】 WANG Ju-tao (Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China)

【机构】 苏州大学法学院 江苏 苏州 215021

【摘要】 行政听证作为保障行政行为公平、公开、公正和保护相对人正当权益的一种重要程序和手段,已为多数国家所重视并在立法中有所体现。我国现行的《行政处罚法》没有将人身自由罚明确列入行政听政程序中去,这应该是一个缺憾。在宪法第四次修正案已明确规定国家尊重和保障人权的宪法环境下,在我国《治安管理处罚条例》即将修改之际,有必要把人身自由罚纳入到行政听证程序的范围中去。

【Abstract】 As an important procedure and means of maintaining the justice, fairness and openness of the administrative activity and protecting the concerned persons’ legitimate interests and proper rights, the administrative hearing legal system has been emphasized by most counties and showed in their laws. But our current Administrative Sanction Law doesn’t explicitly put the personal freedom penalty into the domain of the administrative hearing procedure, which is a big regret. Now, "the state respecting and protecting human rights" has been explicitly written into the 4th Constitutional Amendment of the PRC and our Security Administration Punishment Act will also be modified soon, so it is necessary to take the personal freedom penalty into the category of administrative hearing procedure.

  • 【文献出处】 金陵科技学院学报 ,Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年04期
  • 【分类号】D922.11
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】304
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络