节点文献
对"客观真实说"的理性思考——兼论法律真实
Logic Considerations on "Objective Truth"——On Legal Truth
【摘要】 证明标准是证据制度建构中首先要解决的问题。目前作为证明标准的"客观真实"只是一种理想化的状态,从理论层面看,客观真实不仅与待证事实之间在性质、范围和哲学范畴三方面存在着严重的矛盾,而且在适用马克思主义认识论上也存在诸如认识论主体条件适用的虚假性、使用实践检验标准的缺失、作为证明标准的违理性等缺陷,因此,要彻底抛弃客观真实说而代之以法律真实说,以科学地指导我国的司法活动。
【Abstract】 Proving standard is the first and foremost problem to be solved in the proof system establishment. Today "objective truth" as proving standard is only an ideal state. From the aspect of theory, the objective truth not only conflicts with the facts being proved in nature, range and philosophy category, but also exists the default like the false characteristics of applying the main body’s terms, being lack of testing standard by making use of practice and illogic as proof standard in applying the Marxism epistemology. Therefore, it’s necessary to get rid of the objective truth theory thoroughly, instead, apply the legal truth theory so as to guide our country’s judicial activities scientifical ly.
【Key words】 criminal litigation; objective truth; legal truth; proving standard; facts being proved;
- 【文献出处】 吉林公安高等专科学校学报 ,Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年05期
- 【分类号】D915.13
- 【被引频次】3
- 【下载频次】228