【摘要】 我国合同法94条规定了4项一般合同法定解除权的事由.第一项因不可抗力而解除,第二项因预 期违约而解除,第三项因迟延履行而解除,第四项因根本违约而解除。此条立法很好地表现了我国合同法博采 世界先进立法经验的现象,有海纳百川之势。因不可抗力而解除和因根本违约而解除的立法较为科学,因预期 违约而解除的立法则与合同法中已有的条文相冲突,因迟延履行而解除的立法也存在许多不完善之处。笔者旨 在对因预期违约而解除和因迟延履行而解除的立法进行分析、梳理,并提出一些完善的建议,以抛砖引玉。更多还原

【Abstract】 No. 94th article in China Contract Law has stipulated that rescission of a contract can be caused by 4 kinds of general legal rights of cancellation. Rescission of a contract can be caused by force majesture rule,by anticipatory breach of contract, by delay of performance and by substantial breach of contract .The rule about rescission of a contract caused by force majesture rule arid by anticipatory breach of contract is relative perfect,the rule about rescission of a contract caused by anticipatory breach of contact conflits with other articles,the rule about rescission of a contract caused by delay of performance has some flaws.更多还原