节点文献

阴道灌洗与阴道擦洗的对比研究

Comparative Study Between Vaginal Douche and Vaginal Scmbing

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 朱雯惠杨艳芳邱晓燕官爱萍郭贤贵

【Author】 ZHU Wenhui, YANG Yanfang, QIU Xiaoyan, et al //(Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou 434020, China)

【机构】 荆州市中心医院妇产科荆州市中心医院妇产科 湖北 荆州 434020湖北 荆州 434020湖北 荆州 434020

【摘要】 目的探讨阴道灌洗方法的优越性,改进妇科手术前阴道准备方法。方法选择妇科拟手术病人136例,随机分成擦洗组和灌洗组各68例,分别于手术前进行阴道擦洗和灌洗,于阴道准备前、后分别取两组宫颈拭子作细菌培养,比较细菌阳性率。结果擦洗组和灌洗组细茵阳性率分别为8.8%、0,两组比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论采用阴道灌洗法细菌阳性率明显低于阴道擦洗法,且无任何不良反应。

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the advantages of vaginal douche method over vaginal scrubing and improve the method for vaginal preparation before gynecologic operation. Methods One hundred and thirty-six patients in department of gynecology were selected and randomly divided into two groups: scrubing group (n=68) and douche group (n=68), subjected to vaginal scrubing and vaginal douche before operation. Before and after vaginal preparation, bacterial culture was done and the bacterial positive rate of uterine neck was compared between the two groups. Results The bacterial positive rate in scrubing group and douche group was 8. 8 % and 0, with being significant difference (P<0. 05). Conclusions The vaginal douche without any side effects, and the bacterial positive rate was obviously lower than vaginal scrubing.

【基金】 荆州市医药卫生科技攻关计划(荆科技发[2003]22号)
  • 【文献出处】 护理学杂志 ,Journal of Nursing Science , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年06期
  • 【分类号】R473.71
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】157
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络