【摘要】 其他国家关于仲裁第三人的立法多把进入仲裁后的第三人认定为当事人,我国仲裁法学界大多数学者则将其称为仲裁程序进行中的第三人,两种倾向均有偏颇。通过重新界定仲裁协议第三人这一主体的概念消除我国仲裁法学界因主体定位错误造成的目标主体与论据主体的冲突,揭示仲裁第三人制度的本质涵义,并定位仲裁协议第三人进入仲裁后的主体角色。更多还原

【Abstract】 The lawmaking of other countries concerning the third party of arbitration usually found that the third party who attend to arbitrating procedure is party. But majority scholar in our country regard it as the third party in progress for arbitrating procedure ,the both sides have some errors. This article’s targets aim at the subject about the third party of the arbitrating argreement, avoid contradiction between goal’s subject and method’s subject by definition the concept, illuminate essential meanings about the arbitrating third party ,and orientate the third party of arbitrating argreement’s role after entering arbitrating procedure.更多还原