节点文献

传染病医院口腔器械消毒效果分析

Comparison of the Effect of Sterilizing Methods for Dental Instruments in Infections hospital

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 邓妮妮段培佳

【Author】 DENG Nini1 DUAN Peijia2 1 The eighth People’s Hospital of Guangzhou 510060, China 2 The Guangdong Provincial stomatological Hospital 510280, China

【机构】 广州市第八人民医院广东省口腔医院 广东广州510060广东广州510280

【摘要】 目的比较不同方法对口腔器械的消毒效果,预防交叉感染。方法配置HBsAg悬液、金黄色葡萄球菌液,将人工污染后的口腔器械完全浸入不同的消毒液中或放入压力蒸气灭菌器中进行消毒处理,进行无菌检查。 结果 高压蒸汽消毒灭菌器可使人工污染过的口腔器械全部达到无菌,对HBsAg抗原性灭活达100 %,高压蒸汽消毒灭菌器效果比化学消毒剂的消毒效果好。 结论使用恰当的消毒药水可提高口腔器械消毒效果,高压蒸汽消毒灭菌器灭菌效果可靠,是预防交叉感染的重要手段,传染病医院要注意加强感染管理。

【Abstract】 Objective The aim of study was to investigate the germicidal effects of these different methods. Methods Dental instruments were contaminated artificially by the suspension of HBsAg or Staphylococcus aureus, and then examined the germicidal effect after the different disinfectants or autoclave sterilization was used. Results The germicidal effect of autoclave sterilization was significantly better than chemical disinfectants. Autoclave sterilization could completely kill all virus and bacteria that are contaminated on the dental instruments. Conclusion Suitable disinfectant can improve sterilization effect. Germicidal effect of Autoclave sterilization is more reliable, they can prevent effectively the occurrence of iatrogenic cross infection. Hospital for infectious diseases should enhance supervision of infections.

  • 【文献出处】 国际医药卫生导报 ,International Medicine & Health Guidance News , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年20期
  • 【分类号】R187
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】56
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络