【摘要】 目的探讨不同雾化吸入方法对支气管哮喘的疗效影响及护理。方法将 96例支气管哮喘病人随机分为实验组(A组 )、对照组 1 (B组 )、对照组 2 (C组 )三组 ,每组 32例。A组 :用PARIBOY加THERM压缩加温雾化法 ;B组 :PARIBOY压缩雾化法 ;C组 :超声雾化吸入法。测定治疗前后第一秒用力呼气容积 (FEV1 )与呼气峰流速 (PEF)的值。结果治疗后FEV1 与PEF值差异有统计学意义 (A组与B组比较P <0 .0 5 ,A组与C组比较P <0 .0 1 ) ;临床疗效A组分别与B组、C组差异有统计学意义 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论采用PARIBOY加THERM压缩加温雾化法治疗比单用PARIBOY压缩雾化治疗和超声雾化治疗的疗效更显著。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effectiveness of asthma treatment and nursing by different kinds of atomized inhalation method.Method 96 cases patient with bronchial asthma were divided into experimental group (group A) and control group 1 ( group B) and control group 2 ( group C ) , each group 32 cases, group A was given PARI body plus THERM compression atomized method, Group B was given PARI body compression atomized method, Group C was given ultrasonic atomized inhalation method. The FEV 1 and PEF estimated in first second before and after treatment were recorded and compared.Result There is significant difference in FEV 1 and PEF before and after treatment. (Group A compared with group B, p <0.05, group A compared with group C, p <0.01), there is significant difference in clinical effectiveness in group A compared with group B and group C( p <0.05).Conclusion The curative effectiveness of PARI body plus THERM compression atomized method exceeded remarkably PARI body compression atomized method and ultrasonic atomized inhalation method.更多还原