节点文献

论鉴定结论冲突

On Conflicts of Determinative Conclusions

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 邹积超

【Author】 ZOU Ji-chao (East-China Institute of Politics and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)

【机构】 华东政法学院 上海200042

【摘要】 鉴定结论冲突是指鉴定结论之间存在不一致性 ,相互对立排斥或者相互干扰。鉴定结论的冲突从某种程度上影响了诉讼的正常进行 ,但考察其机理 ,又存在着某种必然性 ,是一种多元因素的产物。因此 ,对待鉴定结论冲突应该本着多元考虑的原则 ,冷静对待 ,通过规范法官的心证 ,制定相应的证明责任规则来规范 ,而不能简单的预定效力。同时应该针对其机理 ,采取必要的预防措施 ,避免其对诉讼的不良影响。

【Abstract】 The conflicts of determinative conclusions refer to the differences, mutual opposites and exclusion, or interference. They influence the proper order of suitcases in some respects. When we check on its mechanism, we come to realize that there exits a certain inevitability and it is a product with multi-factors. Therefore, when treating the conflicts of determinative conclusions, we should base on the principle of many-sided consideration, manage them coolly, formulate relevant proving responsibility regulations by regulating the judge’s mental proofs instead of simply predetermine the effects. Meanwhile, we should carry out necessary precautionary countermeasures by targeting at its mechanism in order to avoid its negative influences over suitcases.

  • 【文献出处】 福建公安高等专科学校学报 , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年06期
  • 【分类号】D915.13
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】299
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络