节点文献

听觉诱发电位指数在全麻诱导插管期间麻醉监测的应用

Evaluate the Effective of Auditory Evoked Potential Index During Induction and Tracheal Intubation on Anaesthesia Depth Monitoring

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 孙宏伟李萍龚秀萍李志学

【Author】 Sun Hong--wei;Li Ping;Gong Xiu--ping, et al.Department of anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001 Department of anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to the Capital Medical University,Beijing 100730

【机构】 哈尔滨医科大学第一临床医学院麻醉科首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科哈尔滨医科大学第一临床医学院麻醉科 哈尔滨 150001北京 100730哈尔滨 150001哈尔滨 150001

【摘要】 目的:观察听觉诱发电位指数全麻诱导期间的变化,评价其在临床上监测麻醉深度的价值。方法:选择胸腹部手术且听力正常的病人36例(ASAⅠ~Ⅱ),分别采用Mid-Fen-Ro(Ⅰ组)和Mid-Fen-Pro-Ro(Ⅱ组)顺序诱导。监测记录诱导前基础值(T0),静注Mid后1min(T1)、静注Fen后1min(T2)、Ⅱ组静注Pro后1min(T3)、静注Ro后1minⅠ组(T3)和Ⅱ组(T4)、插管后1minⅠ组(T4)和Ⅱ组(T5);上述各点的AEPI、MAP和HR。结果:两组病人全麻诱导气管插管前均能达到满意的麻醉深度,但Ⅰ组气管插管后MAP和HR均较T0和插管前明显升高(P<0.01),插管前后比较AAI明显升高,较T3值有显著差异(P<0.001)Ⅱ组气管插管后(T5)MAP和HR与T0比较无差异,较T4也升高,但不如Ⅰ组明显;AAI也较T4明显升高,但仍处于临床麻醉状态。结论:麻醉诱导期间AAI能准确地反映临床镇静麻醉深度;咪达唑仑和异丙酚联合使用能平稳地诱导麻醉且用药量小。

【Abstract】 Objective: To observe the changes of auditory evoked potentials index(AEPI) during induction and trachealintubation and evaluate its value on anasthesia depth monitoring. Methods: Thirty--six ASAⅠ--Ⅱ patients scheduled for elec-tive surgery under general anesthesia. Patients wh psychoneural diseases or hearing disturbances were excluded. Anesthesiawere induced respectively with midzolam 0.2mg/kg, fentanyl 3μg/kg, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg and midzolam 0.02mg/kg, fentanyl3μg/kg,propofol 0.8mg/kg, meuronium 0.6mg/kg given Ⅳ in sequence with an interal of 1 mintue between two injections andmaintained with enfluren inhalation. The depth of anesthesia was monitored by AAI. These parameters were monitored continu-ously and recorded before induction (T0), at 1 minute after each injection and 1 minute after intubation. Results: All patientsrecieved satisfactory depth of anesthesia before intubation. But compared with basic value (T0), the value of MAP and HR afterintubation (T4) increased significantly in group Ⅰ, AAI increased significantly compared with that of T3 (P<0.001). In group Ⅱ,MAP and HR after intubation (T5) have no significant difference with basic value (T0) (P> 0.05), MAP, HR and AAI have signif-icant difference with that of T4 (P<0.05), but patients were in clinical anesthetized state. Conclusions: AAI can predict fairlywell the level of sedation during induction and tracheal intubation. Induction of anesthesia with intravenous midazolam--fen-tanyl--propofol is smooth and effective with little circulatory disturbance.

  • 【文献出处】 中国医药导刊 ,Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide , 编辑部邮箱 ,2004年03期
  • 【分类号】R614
  • 【下载频次】37
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络